• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER; CES BALLOON CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER; CES BALLOON CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BRS00040700
Device Problems Burst Container or Vessel (1074); Inflation Problem (1310)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/01/2011
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that there was inflation/deflation difficulty with the ascent balloon, and product analysis revealed a longitudinal tear in the balloon.The device had been prepped prior to the start of the case with a 1cc syringe using a single-prep technique.It was reported that the balloon did not inflate/deflate properly during prep, and the balloon was not used in the patient.Another balloon was used, and all went well.A mixture of 50/50 contrast was used.No complications resulted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Complaint conclusion: the device was returned for analysis.No defects were found during the catheter outer surface inspection, except in the balloon area where a longitudinal tear of 12mm from the proximal seal and the distal seal was found.The catheter flushed appropriately.The balloon was ruptured, so the balloon could not be inflated, and inflation/deflation verification was not possible.The length between the proximal seal and the distal seal was 12.0mm.This is an indication that the balloon was over inflated, which resulted in stretching the balloon and possibly led to rupture.A review of the manufacturing documentation revealed no issues that could be related to the complaint.The length between the proximal seal and the distal seal was 12.0mm, which means that the balloon was overstretched, and as a result, the unit was damaged.Prior investigations revealed that one of the possible failures when the balloon is over inflated is excessive pressure on the balloon which may lead to longitudinal tears.Therefore, the root cause appears to be balloon over inflation.There is 100% leak testing performed on each balloon catheter before it is released to determine whether the vent hole is open and whether or not the balloon leaks, so it is not likely that the balloon left the manufacturing facility with a leak or a rupture.Since there were no manufacturing issues found during the analysis, no corrective actions were taken.This mdr is being submitted as part of a retrospective review as the result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirements of code of federal regulations - 21 cfr part 803, medical device reporting.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ASCENT - BALLOON CATHETER
Type of Device
CES BALLOON CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4060576
MDR Text Key17296775
Report Number1226348-2014-00356
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K080861
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/01/2011
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/01/2011
Device Catalogue NumberBRS00040700
Device Lot NumberF38851
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/07/2010
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/01/2011
Initial Date FDA Received09/04/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-