(b)(4).Method: the complaint mr850 respiratory humidifier was not returned to fisher & paykel healthcare for evaluation.Therefore, our investigation is based on the information provided by the hospital and our knowledge of the mr850.Results: the complaint mr850 respiratory humidifier was tested by the hospital technician who confirmed that the mr850 passed the performance check with no issues.No fault was found with the complaint mr850.Further information provided by the hospital revealed that an intersurgical breathing circuit and medijet 1000 interface were used with the mr850 at the time of the reported event.Also, the reported injury was on the bridge of the patient's nose and no injury was noted around the patient's nares.Conclusion: based on the information provided by the hospital the reported injury may have been caused by the setup and use of the interface which is not manufactured by fisher & paykel healthcare.Fisher & paykel healthcare does not recommend using third party components such as intersurgical breathing circuits with the mr850.The below warning is included in the mr850 user instructions and is also printed on the mr850."the use of breathing circuits, chambers or other accessories which are not approved by fisher & paykel healthcare may impair performance or compromise safety." the mr850 respiratory humidifier also complies with iso-8185 respiratory tract humidifiers for medical use - particular requirements for respiratory humidification systems.This standard contains several requirments relating to the safety and performance of respiratory humidification systems.To prevent thermal injury, the standard also includes maximum enthalpy limits for humidified gas delivered through respiratory humidification systems.No fault was found with the mr850 during the performance check.This suggests that the mr850 functioned as expected and did not contribute to the reported injury.
|