A facility reported a healthcare worker (hcw) came in contact with hydrogen peroxide while touching a cassette from a sterrad® 100nx.After insertion, the unit rejected the cassette.Consequently, the hcw experienced burning and blanching on her finger.The hcw was not wearing personal protective equipment (ppe) and symptoms were reported to last for one hour.The hcw flushed her finger with water for 15 minutes.The hcw did not seek any medical attention/treatment.This event is being reported as a malfunction report subsequent to a serious injury event dated (b)(6) 2014.
|
Asp investigation summary: the investigation included a review of the device history record (dhr), service history, trending of the product malfunction code, and system hazard and user misuse analysis (shuma).Method- service history, trending and shuma reviewed.¿the dhr was not reviewed as the lot number of the cassette was not available.¿specific information regarding the lot number of the suspect product is not available.No lot trending can be performed.¿the trend for the product malfunction code of skin reaction was assessed from november of 2013 through october of 2014.The risk is considered "remote." ¿the shuma indicates the risk is broadly acceptable.The instructions for use (ifu) of the sterrad® 100nx state: "warning! hydrogen peroxide may be present.Wear chemical resistant latex, pvc (vinyl), or nitrile gloves whenever handling a load after a cycle cancellation or when disposing of a cassette.Hydrogen peroxide liquid may be present on the cassette, the load or in the chamber." testing was not performed as there was no product returned.The assignable cause is attributed to user error.The customer was educated to use proper ppe when handling used cassettes.Review of tracking and trending data did not reveal a trend.As a result, root cause was not performed.
|