• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1012454-08
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Folded (2630)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/22/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was treating a moderately calcified lesion in the proximal right coronary artery.During post-dilatation, the 4.5x8mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was inflated to 22 atmospheres.The balloon was deflated; however, was noted to have a bad re-fold and experienced resistance retracting into the 6f guiding catheter.The balloon was inflated again slightly and then deflated in an attempt to obtain a better re-fold, but the balloon still had a bad re-fold.The balloon was able to be retracted about 80% into the guiding catheter.Due to the resistance with the guiding catheter during retraction, the guiding catheter, balloon, and guide wire were all removed together as a single unit.Post-dilatation was confirmed to be successful and nothing further needed to be done.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): above rated burst pressure (rbp).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for evaluation.The reported difficulty and poor refold was not confirmed; however it may have been due to the circumstances of the procedure.Based on visual, dimensional and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product deficiency.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to this complaint.A query of the electronic complaint handling database revealed no other incidents for difficult to remove from the guiding catheter, improper method, or poor refold reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu) states that the balloon pressure should not exceed the rbp.It is unknown if the reported ifu deviation directly caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key4093825
MDR Text Key16782035
Report Number2024168-2014-05962
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K110134
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/22/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2015
Device Catalogue Number1012454-08
Device Lot Number31212G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/02/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2014
Initial Date FDA Received09/16/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-