Fill volume: 400 ml.Flow rate: 10 ml/hr (initially) then move to 12 ml/hr.Procedure: shoulder surgery.Cathplace: interscalene block.An anesthesiologist reported that pt had shoulder surgery on (b)(6) 2014 with an interscalene block.The pt was discharged home with the on-q pump.Less than 12 hours later that day, she experienced nausea and vomiting and went to ta different emergency room (er).The pt was treated for the nausea and seen by the on-call anesthesiologist to check the block due to some breakthrough pain.The anesthesiologist noted that the catheter looked fine, but the on-q pump was completely empty.The anesthesiologist then bloused the pt with local anesthetic through the catheter and her pain improved.Additional info reported by the pt on (b)(6) 2014, was that she underwent shoulder surgery with general anesthesia.The dial was set to 10 ml/hr and she reported inadequate pain relief, so the dial was turned up to 12ml/hr.After returning home from the surgery, the pt experienced nausea and vomiting.The pt reported she vomited about 30 times in 10 hours.On (b)(6) 2014 at 0200 the pt was transported to the emergency room (er) via ambulance, for severe nausea and vomiting.The pt was seen by the on-call anesthesiologist and it was noted at that time, that the pump was empty.She stated she felt numbness to her neck and face.She said she was also given iv pain medications in the er that provided adequate pain control.The pt was admitted to the hosp on the same day for severe dehydration, abnormal (low) potassium and electrolyte levels.The pt was treated with iv electrolytes (potassium).On (b)(6) 2014, the pt was discharged from the hosp and had recovered from nausea, vomiting, and dehydration.At the time of release the pt was able to tolerate oral food, but the pt continued to have pain and was treated with supplemental oral pain medications.Anp: asked not provided.
|
Method: the device was received for an analysis.A visual inspection was performed and a review of the device history record (dhr) was conducted for the reported lot number.Results: according to the dhr review, the production lot met all mfg and qual specifications at release.At this time the evaluation is still in progress.Results will be provided once completed.Conclusions: once the investigation and device analysis are completed a follow-up report will be submitted.Info from this incident will be included in our product complaint and mdr trend reporting sys.Additional investigation may arise from ongoing analysis, trend info, or other analysis as appropriate.
|