• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EVO-22-27-12-D
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During initial deployment, the delivery mechanism failed as it snapped.The endoscope was in a severe bend.The physician elected to open a boston scientific duodenal stent to complete the procedure.Additional information received confirmed the safety wire had snapped.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This incident meets the reporting criteria of an fda mdr report based on the reporting precedence established for this product family for safety wire breakage; regardless of patient outcome.The device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, a document based investigation was carried out.As the device has not been returned the cause of the complaint could not be conclusively determined.Additional information received from the sales rep indicated the safety wire snapped during the initial phase of deployment while the introducer was inside the patient, the stent did not deploy.The endoscope was in a severe bent position and on the first few squeezes resistance was encountered and they then heard a snap.No photos were available as the device was discarded.A possible cause for the safety wire snapping could be the force used when removing it from the introducer.However, as the device was not returned for evaluation the cause of the complaint could not be conclusively determined.A review of the manufacturing instructions revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.There is a 100% inspection performed on all evo-22-27-12-d devices.As per instructions for use, there are specific instructions for the user on stent deployment.Prior to distribution, all evolution devices are subjected to final functional checks and visual inspection to ensure integrity of the product.The customer complaint could be confirmed based on customer testimony.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
tracy sullivan, unk
61334440
MDR Report Key4128762
MDR Text Key21245620
Report Number3001845648-2014-00174
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K101530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/26/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/23/2016
Device Catalogue NumberEVO-22-27-12-D
Device Lot NumberC1001582
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/26/2014
Initial Date FDA Received09/23/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/23/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-