It was reported that a patient, underwent an atrial fibrillation procedure with a lasso¿ electrophysiology catheter with auto id and stopped deflecting as intended.The catheter was replaced with a same type of product and lot number as the previous one, deflection issue failed to perform as expected.The procedure was completed successfully with a similar-like device.This event is being reported because the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation and found damage in one of the two products returned: spine cover is twisted and torn (internal wires are exposed).This finding is reportable because the potential risk that might lead to the patient.The awareness date for this record is september 3rd because the product was returned and received under this condition.
|
(b)(4) it was reported that a patient, underwent an atrial fibrillation procedure with a lasso electrophysiology catheter with auto id and stopped deflecting as intended.The catheter was replaced with a same type of product and lot number as the previous one, deflection issue failed to perform as expected.The procedure was completed successfully with a similar-like device.This event is being reported because the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation and found damage in one of the two products returned: spine cover is twisted and torn (internal wires are exposed).This finding is reportable because the potential risk that might lead to the patient.The awareness date for this record is september 3rd because the product was returned and received under this condition.A further investigation was performed on this finding, it was reassessed and determined that the overall health risk to the patient is low as the most likely harm is an intra-procedural delay.If unrecognized by the user, it can lead to more serious complications like valvular damage, and puncture of the myocardium.However the likelihood of serious injury is low.The bwi failure analysis lab received the devices for evaluation.The returned device a was visually inspected upon receipt and it was found spine cover was twisted and torn leaving internal wires and tubes exposed.Further information received indicates that the physician did not note that the spin cover was broken prior to insertion of the catheter in the body on both catheters used during the procedure.A dissection of the catheter was made and it was noticed that the lasso loop was internally loose from the nitinol/polymide assembly causing the movement on its own axis.Pu residues were not found in the area.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The device b was visually inspected and it was found in normal conditions.Then per the reported event, a deflection test was performed and the catheter passed.The customer complaint was confirmed.Management is notified of failure analysis through the monthly trending meeting.An internal corrective action has been created to address the spinning lasso.
|