• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Compatibility Problem (2960); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient had an mri in june, she forgot to turn off the device, she didn¿t have the patient programmer to turn it off, and she thought it popped a couple of times and probably sparked.The reason for the mri was unrelated to the device.There were problems during the mri scan and they had to stop.The patient thought the machine was the worst machine, the magnetic resonance was too strong, and the bolts on her jeans were shaking and her rings were jittering during the calibration test.It was a very violent experience and the patient was told that she shouldn¿t have had that reaction, even with the device on.The patient was also told that the reaction would have occurred anyway even if she had turned the device off.The patient had pain at the implant side and in the lower back where the leads were, and since the mri the pain had gotten worse.She didn¿t know if the pain was related to her arthritis with the season change, she already had lower back pain, and she didn¿t know if the pain was because, there was something new in her body.The patient thought she may have hurt herself during the mri.In april, the patient had prolotherapy done to help with the pain, which did help but now the pain was back.She thought the mri had something to do with it because, she left the device on.The patient tried turning the device off for a few days and turning the power down.The device was off for almost two weeks, she turned it on and was able to go a few days where it didn¿t hurt and then it started hurting where the leads were, not where the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was.No interventions or outcome were reported regarding this event.Further follow-up is being conducted to obtain additional information.If additional information is received, a follow-up report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id 3093-28, lot# va087sr, implanted: 2013 (b)(6); product type lead product id 3093-28, lot# va087sr, implanted: 2013 (b)(6); product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4148460
MDR Text Key4786525
Report Number3004209178-2014-18435
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/16/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2014
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/16/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/07/2014
Date Device Manufactured02/08/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age00048 YR
-
-