It was reported that during the procedure to treat a lesion in the mid right coronary artery (rca) with moderate calcification and 90% stenosis, an unknown stent was implanted in the lesion and a 2.75x12 mm nc trek dilatation catheter was advanced without resistance and inflated for post-dilatation of the stent; however, the balloon ruptured at 24 atmospheres.Reportedly, the 2.75x12 mm nc trek dilatation catheter was not submerged in heparinized normal saline prior to use.The 2.75x12 mm nc trek dilatation catheter was withdrawn, resistance was felt in the lesion during withdrawal and another same sized nc trek dilatation catheter was advanced and post dilatation was completed successfully.The patient had another lesion in the proximal left circumflex with mild tortuosity, mild calcification and 85% stenosis an unknown stent was implanted and a 4.0x8 mm nc trek dilatation catheter was advanced to post-dilate but the balloon had a refold issue after the first inflation so the physician decided to change to another balloon.The balloon did not refold as expected.Reportedly, the refold issue resulted in a withdrawal issue, resistance was felt with the patient anatomy during removal of the 4.0x8 nc trek dilatation catheter; however, some force was applied and the dilatation catheter was withdrawn from the patient anatomy.A new same sized nc trek dilatation catheter was advanced and inflated; however, the same issue occurred.Reportedly, there was no deflation issue with the 4.0x8 mm nc trek dilatation catheters.When the nc trek dilatation catheter was withdrawn from the patient anatomy a non-abbott device was used to complete the procedure.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for evaluation.The reported poor refold was confirmed.The reported difficult to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.Based on visual, dimensional and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product deficiency.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to this complaint.A query of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a manufacturing issue.It should be noted that the nc trek instructions for use, warnings section, states: if resistance is felt, determine the cause before proceeding.Continuing to advance or retract the catheter while under resistance may result in damage to the vessels and/or damage/separation of the catheter.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
|