• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problem Obstruction of Flow (2423)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/18/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Same case as mfr id # 2134265-2014-06178.Reportable based on analysis completed (b)(6) 2014.It was reported that during preparation of the device it was noted that the rotalink burr was unable to load onto the rotalink wire.The procedure was completed with another rotalink device.No patient complications were reported.Examination of the returned device revealed a wire fragment was found in the annulus of the burr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The catheter and the advancer were connected upon return.A test guidewire was attempted to be inserted through the device however a resistance was encountered and the wire would not advance through the annulus.Upon inspection of the device it was found the burr annulus was blocked with dried saline.The burr was soaked in warm water and the dried saline dissolved.The burr annulus was again inspected and there was evidence of a wire present in the annulus of the burr.The advancer and the catheter were disconnected to investigate if the wire was running through the entire length of the device.There was no evidence of the wire during the disconnection.The test guide wire was loaded through the disconnected handshake connector of the catheter and advanced towards the burr in an attempt to push the wire fragment through.The wire advanced to the end of the coil however a resistance was encountered and the wire did not advance through the burr.The wire was removed from the catheter and an attempt was made to load the wire through the burr.This was successful and it is possible the wire was successfully loaded due to the dislodgement of the wire that was present in the annulus.The advancer and the catheter were reconnected and the test guide wire was loaded through the entire device with no resistance encountered.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred prior to patient contact.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK? PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4167022
MDR Text Key21523587
Report Number2134265-2014-06380
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2016
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number0016874992
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/31/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/17/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/14/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-