• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Break (1069); Component Missing (2306); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 09/18/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that during a shift check, the head restraint of autopulse platform was found to be damaged and the load plate screws were missing.No patient involvement was reported.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the autopulse platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) message.Although the customer did not report this, ua 7 is considered a reportable malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The reported complaint was confirmed; visual inspection was performed and the head restraint wire and bottom enclosure were found to be damaged as well the load plate screw missing.From the condition of the returned unit, the damages appear to have been due to wear and tear.Unrelated to the reported complaint, a user advisory 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) was displayed during functional testing.Further inspection identified the cause of the ua 7 to be a single point load cell not functioning properly.It was also observed that the platform was not generating the expected audible tone while performing compressions.Testing identified that this was attributed to the processor board not functioning properly.A review of the archive shows no user advisories occurring on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2014.Based on the investigation, the part(s) identified for replacement are the top cover, bottom enclosure, single point load cell, and processor board.In summary, the reported complaint was confirmed during visual inspection and attributed to wear and tear.Unrelated to the reported complaint, a user advisory 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) was displayed during functional testing and found to have been caused by a load cell not functioning.The processor board was also found to not be functioning properly, leading to no audible tone when the platform was performing compressions.Following service, the device passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4170399
MDR Text Key5160764
Report Number3010617000-2014-00527
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/21/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/29/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/14/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/25/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-