• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN HL WMR 3.5X5 NO TAB 25/B 100/C; HEEL WARMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN HL WMR 3.5X5 NO TAB 25/B 100/C; HEEL WARMER Back to Search Results
Model Number MH00002N
Device Problem Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 07/09/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2014 that a customer had an issue with a heel warmer.The customer reports that the heel warmer exploded upon activation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation is currently underway.Upon completion, the results will be forwarded.Attempts to gather information from the customer were made.To date, no response has been received.If additional pertinent information becomes available, the report will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is for product mh00002n, with an unknown lot number.A device history record review could not be performed because a lot number was not received with the complaint.As part of our manufacturing process, all device history records are reviewed and approved by quality, prior to release of product.Because a sample was not returned, we were unable to perform a thorough follow up investigation to include functional and visual evaluations to confirm the defect and root cause analysis.A formal capa (corrective and preventive action), was initiated to determine the root-cause, determine and implement the corrective action(s), and verify the effectiveness of the action(s).While unable to directly confirm that the nature of the described incident is completely aligned with the issue for the referenced capa, it is highly likely that the incident is the same or similar to the issue being solved via the capa.Within the scope of the capa, the root cause has been determined to be the purchased back of pouch material.In the supplier process, there was a weak lamination between the polyester and the polyethylene layers that comprise the back of the pouch material for the last lot of material supplied, which caused the noted bursting phenomenon experienced by the customer.Corrective and preventive actions have been completed to integrate the supplier performed laminate peel test and burst test into the raw material purchase specification (rmps) for the back of pouch material.Specification values around these tests were modified in accordance with acceptable performance as well.This complaint will be shared with the charts/sensors/hydra focus factory to promote awareness and help prevent recurrence.If additional information is obtained, or the sample is returned, this file will be re-opened for further investigation.This complaint will be used for qa tracking and trending purposes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HL WMR 3.5X5 NO TAB 25/B 100/C
Type of Device
HEEL WARMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
two ludlow park drive
chicopee MA 01022
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
two ludlow park drive
chicopee MA 01022
Manufacturer Contact
janice nevius
15 hampshire street
mansfield, MA 02048
5082616283
MDR Report Key4176224
MDR Text Key5153347
Report Number1219103-2014-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MPO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Not Applicable
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/09/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMH00002N
Device Catalogue NumberMH00002N
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/16/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/16/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-