It was reported that the patient presented with a history of intractable nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis, noting that he vomited approximately 30 times since it all began the friday before admission to the hospital.Physical examination found slightly dry mucous membranes and ¿tachy¿ cardiovascular.Laboratory results were unremarkable except for glucose at 246.The patient was placed on intravenous (iv) zofran and other medications to control nausea; he was also given medicine to control high blood pressure.Nausea and vomiting quickly resolved, so the patient¿s diet was advanced quickly as tolerated.Deemed medically stable, the patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2001.However, the device was reportedly ¿not functioning properly¿ so a kidneys ureters bladder (kub) test was ordered in order to check placement of leads.It was noted that the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was ¿malfunctioning¿ and there was a lead impedance issue as they were out of range.On last day of admission, device was checked with demonstrated increased impedance, although kub demonstrated proper placement of leads.Less than a week later, the patient began experiencing nausea and vomiting ¿likely¿ secondary to gastroparesis, stating he could not take any oral medications.The patient was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2001 and had ¿no improvement¿ in his nausea and vomiting since placement.The patient also experienced constipation, mild tenderness of the abdomen, high resting pulse of 99, and elevated blood pressure of 190/119.A chest view was taken which showed mild prominence of mediastinum, secondary to vascular ectasia.It was noted that there was an adverse reaction and that impedances had become greatly elevated to the point that it was uncertain of ins connection to the lead.The leads ¿appeared¿ to be greatly stretched on the flat plate although they ¿did not appear that different on the flat plate than they were from the initial images.¿ the physician opted to perform an exploratory surgery and found that there were ¿several adhesions¿ and the lead had pulled out of the stomach wall.It was noted that the leads had ¿pulled out¿ from the plastic disks which were sewn to the anterior stomach wall; both leads were out of the stomach wall and held to the stomach by the ¿5-0 silk." the insulation sheath had fully covered the lead, most likely due to effect of pulling on the lead against the silk suture.The monofilament had pulled out of the clips on the plastic disks as well.It was noted that the ins was ¿not properly in place.¿ the adhesions were removed, mesothelial lining was removed, wound was revised, and leads were replaced due to "dislodgement" and "positioning difficulties." additionally, upon examination, the serial number was listed as ¿???¿ and the device was not correct as to how much time it had been on.Due to this and the concern that the ins was also malfunctioning, the ins was removed as well on (b)(6) 2001.The event ended (b)(6) 2001 and the patient recovered.Follow up has been conducted.If any additional information is received, a supplemental report will be sent.
|
Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) found no anomaly.The ins was "functionally ok" with a setscrew backed out too far, burn marks on titanium can/insulation coating, foreign material in connector ports, insulation coating was scratched, and "review after por done prior to product analysis." (b)(4).
|