• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 7425G
Device Problems Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problems Adhesion(s) (1695); Nausea (1970); Paresis (1998); Tachycardia (2095); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Vasodilatation (2127); Vomiting (2144); Electrolyte Imbalance (2196); Discomfort (2330); Test Result (2695); Constipation (3274)
Event Date 09/13/2001
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient presented with a history of intractable nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis, noting that he vomited approximately 30 times since it all began the friday before admission to the hospital.Physical examination found slightly dry mucous membranes and ¿tachy¿ cardiovascular.Laboratory results were unremarkable except for glucose at 246.The patient was placed on intravenous (iv) zofran and other medications to control nausea; he was also given medicine to control high blood pressure.Nausea and vomiting quickly resolved, so the patient¿s diet was advanced quickly as tolerated.Deemed medically stable, the patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2001.However, the device was reportedly ¿not functioning properly¿ so a kidneys ureters bladder (kub) test was ordered in order to check placement of leads.It was noted that the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was ¿malfunctioning¿ and there was a lead impedance issue as they were out of range.On last day of admission, device was checked with demonstrated increased impedance, although kub demonstrated proper placement of leads.Less than a week later, the patient began experiencing nausea and vomiting ¿likely¿ secondary to gastroparesis, stating he could not take any oral medications.The patient was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2001 and had ¿no improvement¿ in his nausea and vomiting since placement.The patient also experienced constipation, mild tenderness of the abdomen, high resting pulse of 99, and elevated blood pressure of 190/119.A chest view was taken which showed mild prominence of mediastinum, secondary to vascular ectasia.It was noted that there was an adverse reaction and that impedances had become greatly elevated to the point that it was uncertain of ins connection to the lead.The leads ¿appeared¿ to be greatly stretched on the flat plate although they ¿did not appear that different on the flat plate than they were from the initial images.¿ the physician opted to perform an exploratory surgery and found that there were ¿several adhesions¿ and the lead had pulled out of the stomach wall.It was noted that the leads had ¿pulled out¿ from the plastic disks which were sewn to the anterior stomach wall; both leads were out of the stomach wall and held to the stomach by the ¿5-0 silk." the insulation sheath had fully covered the lead, most likely due to effect of pulling on the lead against the silk suture.The monofilament had pulled out of the clips on the plastic disks as well.It was noted that the ins was ¿not properly in place.¿ the adhesions were removed, mesothelial lining was removed, wound was revised, and leads were replaced due to "dislodgement" and "positioning difficulties." additionally, upon examination, the serial number was listed as ¿???¿ and the device was not correct as to how much time it had been on.Due to this and the concern that the ins was also malfunctioning, the ins was removed as well on (b)(6) 2001.The event ended (b)(6) 2001 and the patient recovered.Follow up has been conducted.If any additional information is received, a supplemental report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Product id: 4351, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) found no anomaly.The ins was "functionally ok" with a setscrew backed out too far, burn marks on titanium can/insulation coating, foreign material in connector ports, insulation coating was scratched, and "review after por done prior to product analysis." (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG
barrio marianna rd 909, km0.4
humacao PR 00792
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4186467
MDR Text Key16545488
Report Number6000032-2014-00244
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/10/2001
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2002
Device Model Number7425G
Device Catalogue Number7425G
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/03/2001
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/10/2001
Initial Date FDA Received10/20/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/23/2001
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-