• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 09/04/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Complainant alleged that during a device check by the customer, it was observed that the top cover of the autopulse was broken and the platform did not work properly.Zoll (b)(4) confirmed that the top cover was broken and that there was a problem with the motor brake, as the platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 17 (max motor on time exceeded during active operation) message.No patient involvement was reported.No further information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Zoll (b)(4) received the product in complaint on 10/04/2014 for investigation.However, investigation is still in progress.A supplemental report will be filed once investigation has been completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Visual inspection of the returned platform shows that both patient head restraints and top cover were cracked.The lcd backlight was also observed to be flickering.The physical damages found during visual inspection are not related to the reported complaint that the platform did not work properly.The visual inspection however, confirmed the reported complaint that the top cover was broken.The damages appear to have been caused by normal wear and tear (autopulse manufactured in 9/2007).A review of the autopulse archive was performed and the reported complaint was confirmed.The archive data shows that a user advisory 17 (max motor on time exceeded during active operation) fault occurred on the reported event date.Other user advisories (uas) such as 18 (max take-up revolutions exceeded), 45 (not at "home" position after power-on/restart), and 19 (max applied load exceeded) also occurred on the reported event date.However, these user advisories are not related to the reported complaint.Functional testing was performed and the reported complaint was confirmed.After a few minutes, the platform stopped compressions and displayed a ua17 fault.It was observed that the drive train motor brake gap was too large and out of specification.The brake gap could not be adjusted back to specification, as the set screws would not lock into the encoder dimple locking hole, causing the brake to disengage.Based on the investigation, the parts identified for replacement were the top cover, lcd, both patient head restraint brackets and drive train short motor.In summary, the reported complaint that the platform did not work properly was confirmed during functional testing.The fault was found to be due to the defective drive train short motor causing the ua17 fault.The physical damages found during visual inspection confirmed the reported complaint that the top cover was broken.The ua18, ua19, and ua45 faults observed during the archive review are unrelated to the reported complaint.The root cause for these user advisories could not be determined.However, per the autopulse maintenance guide (p/n 11653-001), ua18 is an indication that there is no patient on the platform.The root cause for the ua45 could not be determined.However, per the autopulse® resuscitation system model 100 user guide (pn: 12555-001), if the driveshaft is not at its home position when the autopulse is powered on, a user advisory 45 will occur.This user advisory will persist until the driveshaft is returned to its home position.Upon replacement of all parts, the platform was re-evaluated through functional testing and the platform passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4191109
MDR Text Key16083470
Report Number3010617000-2014-00536
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-03
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/04/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/22/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/21/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/22/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-