• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION COREVALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION COREVALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number MCS-P3-3143
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Congestive Heart Failure (1783); Low Cardiac Output (2501)
Event Date 02/03/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that after the implant of an initial transcatheter bioprosthetic heart valve, the patient experienced a paravalvular leak (pvl) that varied between moderate and severe with a diminished ejection fraction.The patient had subsequently had a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator implanted to help with the ejection fraction, and at 17 months this device had been implanted valve-in-valve to address the pvl.One year after the valve-in-valve procedure, the pvl had again increased to a severe level, and an attempt was made to resolve the pvl with another manufacturer¿s plug.The condition remained ongoing, and one month later, another manufacturer¿s closure device was used to repair the pvl.The echocardiogram following that procedure showed a mild pvl and trace central regurgitation.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The valves remain implanted.A supplemental report will be filed when the investigation is completed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The reported clinical observations do not indicate a potential manufacturing issue.Conduction disturbances are known potential adverse effects per corevalve instructions for use (ifu), and can be resolved with the implant of a permanent pacemaker with the risk-benefit ratio in favor of the percutaneous aortic valve (pav).In this case a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator was implanted to improve ejection fraction.Post-implant occurrence of paravalvular leak (pvl) after an extended time period can be caused by a variety of factors, including changes to patient anatomy or pre-existing medical conditions, and the root cause could not be determined from the information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COREVALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4192575
MDR Text Key5162846
Report Number2025587-2014-00782
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional,health professional,stu
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/26/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/09/2013
Device Model NumberMCS-P3-3143
Device Catalogue NumberMCS-P3-3143
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/22/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
03/26/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/15/2015
09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured11/13/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MCS-P3-943, (B)(4)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00083 YR
-
-