MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION COREVALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number MCS-P3-3143 |
Device Problems
Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problems
Congestive Heart Failure (1783); Low Cardiac Output (2501)
|
Event Date 02/03/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that after the implant of an initial transcatheter bioprosthetic heart valve, the patient experienced a paravalvular leak (pvl) that varied between moderate and severe with a diminished ejection fraction.The patient had subsequently had a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator implanted to help with the ejection fraction, and at 17 months this device had been implanted valve-in-valve to address the pvl.One year after the valve-in-valve procedure, the pvl had again increased to a severe level, and an attempt was made to resolve the pvl with another manufacturer¿s plug.The condition remained ongoing, and one month later, another manufacturer¿s closure device was used to repair the pvl.The echocardiogram following that procedure showed a mild pvl and trace central regurgitation.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The valves remain implanted.A supplemental report will be filed when the investigation is completed.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The reported clinical observations do not indicate a potential manufacturing issue.Conduction disturbances are known potential adverse effects per corevalve instructions for use (ifu), and can be resolved with the implant of a permanent pacemaker with the risk-benefit ratio in favor of the percutaneous aortic valve (pav).In this case a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator was implanted to improve ejection fraction.Post-implant occurrence of paravalvular leak (pvl) after an extended time period can be caused by a variety of factors, including changes to patient anatomy or pre-existing medical conditions, and the root cause could not be determined from the information provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|