• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS) Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Pocket Stimulation (1463); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Low impedance (2285); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient experienced overstimulation and shocking and jolting sensations.It was also noted that the patient had ¿electrical sensations¿ at the implantable neurostimulator (ins) pocket site related to ¿optical sensations.¿ impedance testing was performed and found low impedances of 59 ohms.The cause of the issue was not known and the issue was not resolved.The patient status at the time of report was unknown.Additional follow up is being performed to obtain the patient outcome.A supplemental report will be submitted if additional information is received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information was received which reported that surgery was required as a result of the impedance issues previously reported.Initially, the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was tested and low impedances, all between 50 ohms and 70 ohms, were measured on 3 poles on the right electrode.The low impedances persisted when testing was performed on the adaptor.After changing the adaptor, the impedances of those poles were between 819 ohms and 831 ohms.The ins was then connected, and the same low impedances were observed on the ¿first canal¿ (0-7).The canal was changed to 8-15, and a low impedance of 56 ohms was measured on poles 12 and 15.After opening the ¿safety cap¿ while checking the connection between the lead and extension, it was discovered that there was damage to the wire coating on both leads, above the connection point of the extension and lead.That portion of the leads had no wire coating.Additionally, the wire coating "on the middle of one lead" was damaged my mechanical removal.This was determined to have been the cause of the impedance issue.An ¿emergency¿ replacement of the patient¿s extensions and leads were required on that same day due to the ¿extreme dystonia problems¿ of the patient without stimulation.The new leads/extensions were then connected to the patient¿s ins.Impedances were subsequently ok and the issue resolved.X-rays were also taken, but the results were not provided.After the procedure, therapy was switched on and the patient ¿felt good¿ in the operating room.It was noted that the patient had been placed in the intensive care unit for monitoring.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products: product id 3387-40, serial # unknown, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead; product id 3387-40, serial # unknown, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead; product id 7482, # serial # unknown, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type extension; product id 7482, serial # unknown, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type extension; product id 64002, serial # unknown, implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type adapter.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of lead model 3387-40 sn: unknown found the #0 and #1 conductors were broken 9.5 cm from the distal end due to overstress damage.All connector sleeves were stretched and all conductors were broken at the connector weld sites.Breached metal-induced oxide (mio) was observed on the outer insulation at the proximal end of the lead.Analysis of lead model 3387-40 sn: unknown found no significant anomalies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4200592
MDR Text Key4984693
Report Number3004209178-2014-20375
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/30/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2011
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/03/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/02/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/24/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/28/2014
12/03/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/06/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-