• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number A25-25/C95-O20
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/29/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that approximately 37 months post implant of a bifurcated device and a suprarenal aortic extension an endoleak was identified.The patient had a ct and physician elected to reline the overlap with 2 cuffs.Patient is doing fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Endologix continues to investigate the reported event.Endologix will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Device remains implanted in patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device remains implanted in the patient and is therefore, not available for analysis.Medical records and imaging were provided and reviewed by an internal clinical representative with the following impression: product use was incongruent with the ifu due to: the greater than 60 aortic neck.Cautionary product use conditions included an impending rupture state of the aneurysm; jetting calcifications at the bifurcation; and, a concomitant thoracic aneurysm.The patient's use of antiplatelet therapy might have contributed to this event due to the associated increase risk for bleeding complications.Given the longevity of the device and the patient's medical history, there might have been disease progression and/or unresolved endotension that might have contributed to this event.The endoleak type iii and the secondary procedure were substantiated by medical documentation; however, specifically, a type iiib could not be substantiated.Medical documentation mentioned a type i and ii at the implant procedure, but could not be substantiated due to lack of information.The patient was discharged to rehabilitation post-operative day seven.A manufacturing record review was performed, the lot met all release criteria with no related issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.The lot usage history showed all units have been consumed and no other units were involved in any similar event.The product labeling was reviewed and confirmed that the reported event is adequately captured in the existing labeling.Based upon the investigation findings, an exact root cause could not be determined based upon available information.However, the use of a device in a greater than 60 degree angle (off-label) might have contributed to this event along with the patient's use of antiplatelet therapy due to the associated increase risk for bleeding complications.Given the longevity of the device and the patient's medical history, there might have been disease progression and/or unresolved endotension that might have contributed to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX SYSTEM
Type of Device
SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gail hapner
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495957287
MDR Report Key4210439
MDR Text Key4965847
Report Number2031527-2014-00303
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2012
Device Model NumberA25-25/C95-O20
Device Lot NumberW11-2908-022
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/19/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/29/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/21/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
-
-