• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. RAD® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. RAD® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT Back to Search Results
Model Number 1884012HR
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/07/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported to me that the blade broke and a piece of it fell in the maxillary sinus.That piece was retrieved with an instrument causing a ten minute delay.It was noted that earlier in the case, the scrub nurse took the stylet to clean out the blade and the shaver pedal was accidentally pressed down, causing the blade to get stuck.The customer thought that this could have possibly done something internally but wasn¿t certain.After the stylet was removed it seemed to be working fine for a portion of the case.There was no injury to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is used for therapeutic purposes.(b)(4).The device has been received and analysis is currently underway.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As received condition: received 1 sample(s), part number 1884012hr.There was evidence of biological contaminants [based off of the reactivity with hydrogen peroxide].Equipment used: microscope (zeiss stemi 2000c between 0,65 to 5,0 magnification settings).Observations: when compared to the assembly drawing 66500090 revision g: the middle spiral wrap failed and the tip broke off as a result which would have resulted in the reported malfunction.When viewed under magnification, there was deformation of the front hub that is consistent with excess pressure being applied while in the handpiece.The extent of the spiral wrap damage may indicate the device was being run in forward direction however this cannot be confirmed.The instructions for use 68e4066 revision k warns: excessive pressure applied to bur/blade may cause fracture.Note: [excess: exceeded sufficient pressure required for operation].Additionally the instructions for use warns ¿powered blades should be operated in the oscillate mode only.Operating in the forward mode may cause damage to the blade.¿ there was no evidence of improper manufacturing therefore manufacturing has been ruled out as a potential cause.Method ¿ actual device evaluated; labeling evaluation; visual inspection fda; microscopic inspection; results: stress problem.Conclusion: operational context caused or contributed to event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAD® BLADE
Type of Device
BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC XOMED INC.
6743 southpoint dr n
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC XOMED INC.
6743 southpoint dr north
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer Contact
charlotte ayala
6743 southpoint dr north
jacksonville, FL 32216
9043328372
MDR Report Key4214679
MDR Text Key4997304
Report Number1045254-2014-00280
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EQJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1884012HR
Device Catalogue Number1884012HR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/24/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/10/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/30/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
11/10/2014
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/11/2014
09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00031 YR
Patient Weight95
-
-