• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL NAIL HOLDING SCREW T2 TIBIA SPI; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL NAIL HOLDING SCREW T2 TIBIA SPI; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 18061401
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Fitting Problem (2183)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/05/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The sales rep, (who was present during the procedure), has reported on behalf of the customer, that when it came to attaching a tibial nail onto the spi nail adaptor the spi nail holding screws would reportedly not fit through the nail adaptor.The sales rep has reported that this resulted in the scrub team/ surgeon being unable to attach the nail onto the adaptor.The sales rep has reported that this meant, having made an incision through the quadriceps tendon, there was no way of getting the nail down the tissue sleeves with the jig attached for guided proximal locking.The sales rep has reported that an approximate delay of 30 mins to surgery occurred while the surgeon was trying to fix the jig and get the nail holding screw through and then finding alternative ways of getting the nail down the shaft of the tibia.The sales rep has reported that she suggested using the t2 universal rod and the surgeon locked proximally with 1 screw freehand.The sales rep has reported that the surgeon would have placed two screws proximally through the jig if he were able to have attached the nail to the jig.The sales rep has reported that the patient was a (b)(6) year old male.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.To add to this complaint, the sales rep has also reported that these instruments were from a newly commissioned demo loan kit set ((b)(4)).On friday (b)(6), the sales rep was at the account performing a "show and tell" demonstration of the instrumentation that went on to be used on (b)(6).The sales rep has reported that she had ordered the customer a live loan set to use in surgery, which was delivered to the customer.The sales rep has reported that she then took the live kit to sterile services so that it would be ready to sterilize.The sales rep is unaware how the demo set went on to be used instead of the live kit, and that the surgeon believes this to be a hospital error.As mentioned previously, the demo set was newly commissioned and has never been used on saw bones or cadavers and had only been used as part of the show and tell demonstration.The sales rep has reported that all instrumentation from the demo kit was sterilized prior to use in surgery.The sales rep has reported that it was noted after surgery that the demo kit was appropriately labeled with "demo" labels.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: a review of the dhr revealed no discrepancies.Evaluation did not reveal any discrepancies in material or manufacturing of the returned devices.The appearance of damage indicates that the devices got jammed by ¿cold welding¿ due to friction welding being caused by high surface pressure.Local surface pressure may arise when the items are assembled under misalignment which cannot be excluded during training.A deficiency in the undamaged areas of the returned items was not verified.The products had left the manufacturing site in intended condition.
 
Event Description
The sales rep, (who was present during the procedure), has reported on behalf of the customer, that when it came to attaching a tibial nail onto the spi nail adaptor the spi nail holding screws would reportedly not fit through the nail adaptor.The sales rep has reported that this resulted in the scrub team/ surgeon being unable to attach the nail onto the adaptor.The sales rep has reported that this meant, having made an incision through the quadriceps tendon, there was no way of getting the nail down the tissue sleeves with the jig attached for guided proximal locking.The sales rep has reported that an approximate delay of 30mins to surgery occurred while the surgeon was trying to fix the jig and get the nail holding screw through and then finding alternative ways of getting the nail down the shaft of the tibia.The sales rep has reported that she suggested using the t2 universal rod and the surgeon locked proximally with 1 screw freehand.The sales rep has reported that the surgeon would have placed two screws proximally through the jig if he were able to have attached the nail to the jig.The sales rep has reported that the patient was a (b)(6) old male.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NAIL HOLDING SCREW T2 TIBIA SPI
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-24 232
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-24 232
Manufacturer Contact
rose haas
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4216126
MDR Text Key4972418
Report Number0009610622-2014-00608
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K131365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/05/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number18061401
Device Lot NumberK07E94B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/13/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/20/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/31/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/18/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-