• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Compatibility Problem (2960)
Patient Problems Micturition Urgency (1871); Urinary Retention (2119)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was initially reported on (b)(6) 2014 that the patient requested compatibility guidelines for the ct/cat scans.The reason for ct scan was related to the reason he has neurostimulator therapy.The patient never had therapeutic effect.At first he thought it might have been helping his urgency and frequency but was not sure.The patient doesn't know when the symptoms returned.He doesn't know if therapy ever really worked for him.He met with manufacturer representative three times and has had reprogramming done.Tried increasing stimulation on his programmer and also trying all 4 programs.This last visit with the manufacturer representative, which was 2 weeks before reported event date, she found that "all 4 prongs weren't activated." the patient thinks manufacturer representative was made aware of the issue that his therapy wasn't helping him 2 weeks ago.The patient has gone through all medicines and has gotten botox as well.The day of the reported event date was the 8th day of botox.He has to self-catheterize 4-5 times a day.Even after he does this, within an hour he starts having severe urges.The patient¿s healthcare provider was looking for another underlying cause of this issue.He had bowel surgery before he had the implant 6-7 years ago which was back in 2008.Additional information received on (b)(6) 2014 from the healthcare provider noted that there was not a 50% or greater symptom reduction.The event cause was not determined.Reprogramming was needed.It was noted: "not working".It was also noted that the patient needed mri.It was noted that the patient had a loss of therapeutic effect (never had).The patient did not experience a loss of stimulation.Explant of the system was scheduled for (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 3889-28, lot# va0ejmc, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.Product id: neu_pt m_prog, lot# unknown, product type: programmer, patient.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4216777
MDR Text Key5041822
Report Number3004209178-2014-20738
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2015
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/23/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/31/2014
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00053 YR
-
-