Event date: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(4).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A manufacturing evaluation was completed: investigation shows that one jaw distal is cracked.The edges showing massive dents which make it likely there were impacts from high mechanical force.The investigation of documentation for material and manufacturing shows that the instrument produced in december 2006 print specification.A failure in material or manufacturing could not be detected.Due to the high use age of the front cutter, it is likely that the breaking point of the material has been exceeded and finally led to the material failure/fatigue fracture.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|