• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX ? DUODENAL; STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX ? DUODENAL; STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00565030
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/13/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex enteral duodenal stent was used during a duodenal stenting procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, the stent was being used to treat a malignant stricture.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous.During the procedure, after reaching the target lesion, the physician attempted to deploy the stent however, the handle broke halfway through the deployment.The partially deployed stent was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) stent partially deployed.The device has been received for analysis; however the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex enteral duodenal stent was used during a duodenal stenting procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, the stent was being used to treat a malignant stricture.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous.During the procedure, after reaching the target lesion, the physician attempted to deploy the stent however, the handle broke halfway through the deployment.The partially deployed stent was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: visual examination of the returned device noted that the stent was received fully mounted on the delivery catheter.Device analysis confirmed that the outer sheath had detached from the distal handle and the investigator was unable to deploy the stent by manually retracting the outer sheath by hand.The dark blue outer sheath was creased and kinks were found at various positions along its length.These type of damages are consistent with excessive force exerted on the catheter during deployment.The stainless steel tube was broken exposing the inner.The break was 95mm distal to the proximal handle and it was also noted that the stainless steel tube was severely kinked at two separate positions along its length.The blue section of the outer sheath was dissected longitudinally and it was noted that some of the polytetrafluoroethylene (ptfe) coating had partially peeled away from the inside of the outer sheath.The stent and the inner were visually and microscopically examined and no issues were noted with their profiles that could have contributed to the complaint incident.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets design and manufacture specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance of the device was limited.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification for the reported failure is operational context.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLFLEX ? DUODENAL
Type of Device
STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4228039
MDR Text Key4971660
Report Number3005099803-2014-03558
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K062750
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/14/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/17/2016
Device Model NumberM00565030
Device Catalogue Number6503
Device Lot Number0016667739
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/04/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2014
Initial Date FDA Received11/05/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/18/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/21/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
-
-