|
Model Number M00516740 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal stent was implanted in the esophagus during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) with stent placement procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the stent was implanted to treat a bariatric leak after a bariatric surgery.Reportedly, a few days post stent implantation (exact date unknown) the patient coded and was sent to the icu.The patient is on tracheostomy tube, has an infection, and is unstable.According to the complainant, there was no malfunction of the stent and the patient issues were not related to the stent.However, the complainant was unable to provide information regarding the cause of the patient issues or any pre-existing conditions the patient may have had.Boston scientific has been unable obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event to date.Should additional relevant details become available a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complainant was unable to report the lot number; therefore the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.(b)(4).The device remains implanted; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.''infection'' is listed within the dfu as potential adverse event.There was evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications.The dfu states ''the wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.'' however, this device was used after a bariatric leak following bariatric surgery.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification of this investigation is use/user error.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|