• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PXL161407
Device Problem Sticking (1597)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/10/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2014, a patient was treated for an abdominal aortic aneurysm with gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses.The trunk-ipsilateral leg endoprosthesis was advanced and deployed using the gore® c3® delivery system.An iliac extender endoprosthesis was attempted to be advanced to the ipsilateral side, however, it felt as if it were stuck in the external iliac artery.An attempt was made to remove the device.During attempted removal the stent expanded and separated from the delivery catheter.The olive was recaptured with a snare.A second device was introduced and deployed from the contralateral side without incident.The patient did well following the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: a review of the manufacturing records for the device verified the lot met all pre-release specifications.Conclusion: the device was discarded therefore an engineering investigation could not be conducted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The engineering evaluation has been updated as follows: the device evaluation showed the following: the delivery catheter was returned for evaluation.Blood residue was observed on the throughout the delivery catheter.The leading end of the delivery catheter was separated at the trailing olive.The separated leading end of the catheter (endoprosthesis with the polyimide guidewire lumen) was not returned and could not be evaluated.No damage was seen on the trailing olive or the catheter shaft.The deployment knob was still screwed in the deliver catheter.The guidewire and introducer sheath were not returned and could not be evaluated.The excluder instructions for use (ifu) clearly states: do not attempt to withdraw any undeployed endoprosthesis through the 12 fr or 18fr introducer sheath.The sheath and catheter must be removed together.Do not continue advancing any portion of the delivery system if resistance is felt during advancement of the guidewire, sheath, or catheter.Stop and assess the cause of resistance.Vessel or catheter damage may occur.Do not continue to withdraw the delivery catheter if resistance is felt during removal through the introducer sheath.Forcibly withdrawing the delivery catheter through the introducer sheath when resistance is encountered has resulted in adverse events including catheter separation and reintervention.After completion of the final assembly process in gore sunnyvale, the integrity of the product was inspected per md33988 aaa final inspection.A review of the master process sheet (mps) verified that the lot met the specification and acceptance criteria.The root cause for the reported difficulty to advance the device could not be determined with the currently available information.The root cause for the reported premature deployment could not be determined with the currently available information.The root cause for the broken leading end of the delivery catheter could not be determined with the currently available information.The results of this investigation did not warrant a capa.This type of occurrence will continue to be trended and appropriate actions will be taken as they are deemed necessary.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: part of the device system was returned and evaluated.The engineering evaluation stated the leading end of the delivery catheter was pulled out at the trailing olive.The pulled out leading end of the catheter (endoprosthesis with the polyimide guidewire lumen) was not returned and could not be evaluated.No damage was seen on the trailing olive or the catheter shaft.The deployment knob was still screwed in the delivery catheter.The guidewire and introducer sheath were not returned and could not be evaluated.The gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu) clearly states: do not attempt to withdraw any undeployed endoprosthesis through the 12 fr or 18fr introducer sheath.The sheath and catheter must be removed together.Do not continue advancing any portion of the delivery system if resistance is felt during advancement of the guidewire, sheath, or catheter.Stop and assess the cause of resistance.Vessel or catheter damage may occur.Do not continue to withdraw the delivery catheter if resistance is felt during removal through the introducer sheath.Forcibly withdrawing the delivery catheter through the introducer sheath when resistance is encountered has resulted in adverse events including catheter separation and reintervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL SUNNYVALE B/P
1327 orleans drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
heidi inskeep
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key4291301
MDR Text Key5052650
Report Number2953161-2014-00148
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
PMA/PMN Number
P020004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/13/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2017
Device Catalogue NumberPXL161407
Device Lot Number12595945
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/18/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/02/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/04/2015
03/27/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/20/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MEDICATIONS: ANTICOAGULANT MEDICATION (UNKNOWN)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient Weight60
-
-