• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C3260
Device Problem Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/04/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the pusher assembly was fractured approximately 68.5 cm from the distal detachment tip (ddt), kinked approximately 63.0 cm from the ddt, and kinked 5.0, 9.0, 24.0, and 106.0 cm from the proximal end.The coil was kinked throughout its length.The distal detachment tip (ddt) outer diameter (od) was measured and found to be within product specifications.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The complaint indicated that during the procedure, the coils could not be advanced into a microcatheter.The coils were removed and the patient was not affected.Evaluation of the returned devices revealed in the first ruby coil, the pusher assembly was fractured and kinked, and the coil was kinked.Further evaluation revealed in the second ruby coil, the pusher assembly and introducer sheath were kinked.The type of damage found on both ruby coils typically occurs due to attempting to advance the device past resistance.In both ruby coils, the od of the ddt was measured within specification.The microcatheter used in the case was not returned and the model of the microcatheter was not reported in the complaint and, therefore, the root cause of the inability to advance the coils into the microcatheter cannot be determined.These devices are 100% functionally tested and visually inspected during process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure of an aortic artery aneurysm using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician was unable to advance two ruby coils into the microcatheter and they were not used.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: this device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This mdr is associated with mdr 3005168196-2014-00845.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4302984
MDR Text Key13449368
Report Number3005168196-2014-00844
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/05/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date06/30/2019
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C3260
Device Lot NumberF44312
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/05/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-