• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0620
Device Problems Break (1069); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/05/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in a gonadal vein using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician was unable to detach a ruby coil.A ruby coil detachment handle was used and the pet lock was broken, yet the coil remained attached.The physician unsuccessfully attempted to detach the coil by manually pulling the proximal portion of the pullwire.The physician withdrew the ruby coil from the patient and the procedure continued using a new coil.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: this device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the ruby coil pusher assembly was fractured approximately 159.5 cm from the distal tip.The entire pull wire was removed from the pusher assembly.The ruby coil was detached from the pusher assembly.The ruby coil proximal constraint sphere outer diameter was measured within specification.The ruby coil distal detachment tip (ddt) inner diameter was measured within specification.The ruby coil pull wire was not returned.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The complaint indicates that the ruby coil did not detach while the physician was using a detachment handle.Evaluation of the returned product confirms that the coil was detached from the pusher assembly.It appears that due to the physician's efforts to get the coil to detach correctly, the coil was detached from the pusher.The proximal end of the pusher assembly and pull wire were not returned for evaluation.The components that are used to keep the coil intact, the proximal constraint sphere and ddt with the pusher assembly, were measured within specification.The tortuosity in the patient's vessel could have prevented the coil from detaching.The cause of this complaint cannot be determined.These devices are 100% functional tested during process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4303016
MDR Text Key18271529
Report Number3005168196-2014-00846
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/05/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0620
Device Lot NumberF41469
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/02/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/27/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/08/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/14/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-