• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Device Problem Failure to Osseointegrate (1863)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Impaired Healing (2378); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article, tang, p., hu, f., shen, j., zhang, l.And zhang, l.(2012).Proximal femoral antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Injury, int.J.Care injured, 43, 876-881.The authors conducted a retrospective controlled study of 303 patients, mean age 81.7 years, with intertrochanteric fractures during the years 2003 to 2009.One hundred forty seven patients (77 men and 70 women) were treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (pfna) developed by arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen / association for the study of internal fixation and 156 patients (85 men and 71 women) underwent hemiarthroplasty.The average follow-up period was 39.9 months.Two hundred ninety patients were followed up successfully with an eventual 202 patients who were eligible for functional outcome comparison between the two groups (pfna: 106 patients; hemiarthroplasty: 96 patients).Complications in the pfna group involved four cut out / migration, four malrotation, two shortening more than five centimeters, one serious local pain and one unsatisfactory primary osteosynthesis treated with an emergent reosteosynthesis.Six patients needed unspecified secondary surgery.Ten patients rated their harris grade functional outcome as: bad.A copy of the literature article is attached to this medwatch.This report is 1 of 3 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown pfna construct and refers to four malrotation, two shortening more than five centimeters, one serious local pain and one unsatisfactory primary osteosynthesis treated with an emergent reosteosynthesis.Six patients needed unspecified secondary surgery.Ten patients rated their harris grade functional outcome as: bad.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): tang, p., hu, f., shen, j., zhang, l.And zhang, l.(2012).Proximal femoral antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Injury, int.J.Care injured, 43, 876-881.This report is for an unknown pfna construct/unknown quantity/unknown lot.Screw, fixation, bone; hwc.Pertains to malrotation, shortening and functional outcome rating as: bad.The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4303712
MDR Text Key5057156
Report Number2520274-2014-15163
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physical Therapist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/19/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/19/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-