• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult To Position (1467); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This is a spontaneous case report received from a medical doctor in united states on 11-nov-2014 which refers to a female patient of unspecified age who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted on an unspecified date.It was reported that patient had difficult essure placement.The reporter stated that there were no trailing coils.Then, she check the inserters and the coils were not present.An x-ray was done on the day of the placement and coils were present but not visible in the tubes.Five days later, a laparoscopy was done to do bilateral salpingectomy and coils were not in tubes upon removal or visualizable.Follow up information is not expected since reporter forbids further contact or interview.Ptc investigation result was received on 20-nov-2014.This adverse event report is related to a product technical complaint (ptc).(b)(4).Final assessment: since no product was returned to us for investigation, we were unable to perform an investigation of the actual device involved in this complaint.Typically, we would inspect the micro-insert to confirm that all parts are accounted for and inspect the device to look for any manufacturing deficiencies.Since we have no valid lot number for this case, we were unable to conduct a review of the manufacturing batch record.We are unable to confirm any quality defect or device malfunction at this time.Medical assessment: this ptc was initiated due to a request for confirmation of quality.In addition, the ae case refers to a usability issue.The reported adverse event is a known, possible, undesirable event and not indicative of a quality deficit per se.No batch number was reported.Without this information no batch signal cluster review in the gpv database for a more detailed statistical medical evaluation is possible.No complaint sample was provided for a technical investigation.The technical assessment concluded "unconfirmed quality defect".In summary, there is no reason to suspect a causal relationship to a potential quality deficit.Company causality comment: this spontaneous, medically confirmed case report refers to a female patient of unspecified age who had essure (fallopian tubes occlusion insert) inserted.The insertion was difficult and in the same day of placement, the x-ray showed that coils were present but not visible in the tubes.The event, interpreted as device dislocation, is serious due medical importance and listed in the reference safety information for essure.During essure micro-insert therapy there is a risk that the device could move out of fallopian tubes, this movement could be an expulsion (into uterus or out of the body) or dislocation (distal fallopian tube or peritoneal cavity).In this case, during the difficult insertion procedure, the physician did not find the coils.She checked the inserters but the devices were not there.X-ray was performed and showed the coils were present but not visible in tubes.Then, five days later, a laparoscopy was done to perform bilateral salpingectomy and upon removal, the micro-inserts were not in tubes and were not visualized.Given the nature of the event, causality is assessed as related to essure use and since bilateral salpingectomy (serious injury) was performed, the case is regarded as incident.Product technical complaint (ptc) analysis concluded to an unconfirmed quality defect (no batch number was provided).Medical ptc assessment considered that, based on the available information, there is no reason to suspect quality defect of the product.Follow up information is not expected since reporter forbids further contact or interview.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Data correction for us reporting: the code knh was replaced with hhs.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, CA 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, CA 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd.
p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key4305370
MDR Text Key21835022
Report Number2951250-2014-00509
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,health professional,oth
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/11/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-