• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) POLARIS? ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) POLARIS? ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M006192122090
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/06/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris¿ ultra stent set was used during an extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the polaris¿ ultra stent had difficulty advancing into the urethra and the device bent.Four more attempts were done with no success.The procedure was completed with a different device.The patient¿s ureteral orifice had a little redness due to numbers of placement attempts.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.This event has been deemed a reportable event based on the investigation results; stent ripped/torn.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation results: stent torn.A visual analysis on the returned polaris ultra stent set was performed.The stent has a renal pigtail torn, the tip was split/ripped and the bladder pigtail was accordioned.The sensor guidewire corewire was stretched.All the outer diameter measurements of the guidewire are within specification.Functional evaluation was performed.A mandrel 0.038 inches was inserted through the stent and it passed properly without resistance.Additionally, the returned sensor guidewire was inserted through the stent and still it passed properly without resistance.The issue was noted inside the patient during the procedure, moreover, there were some attempts to pass the device through the ureter.Most likely, the damages noted on the device could have been related from anatomical and procedural factors.Therefore, the most probable root cause for this complaint is operational context.The device history record review found the device met all manufacturing specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARIS? ULTRA
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4306031
MDR Text Key5085364
Report Number3005099803-2014-03885
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
K010002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/10/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2014
Device Model NumberM006192122090
Device Catalogue Number192-122-09
Device Lot Number15172494
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/25/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/10/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
Patient Weight90
-
-