• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CRC14123030
Device Problem Positioning Failure (1158)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/25/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the cashmere coil (crc141230-30 / (b)(4)) could not be detached despite pressing the detachment button five times.After re-connecting the enpower dcb, the physician re-attempted the detachment, but no avail.Further re-attempts were made by slightly torquing and moving in and out the coil, and after pressing the detachment button four times, the coil was eventually detached.Pre-deployment was conducted prior to inserting and using.After the event, the procedure was completed without further issues by mainly using the competitive products due to the physician¿s apprehension with cashmere.There were no patient injury/complications.There was no report of if the procedure was delayed or not.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends, etc.) was noted on the product by visual inspection.Also no visible damages were reported on the devices after the events.There was no unintended detachment of the coil observed in the vessels or in the mc.Since the actual coil was successfully detached and the dpu and sheath have already been disposed, the complaint product is not available for analysis.No further information is available.The procedure was the coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm at the patient¿s ica.The patient¿s sex, dob and weight were unknown.The tortuosity and the calcification level of the patient¿s vessels were also unknown.There was no information of the concomitant devices used in the procedure.It was reported that an enpower dcb and a cable (lots unknown) were used for the above procedure.No further details of the concomitant devices are available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The product will not be returned for analysis, and additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the cashmere coil ((b)(4)) could not be detached despite pressing the detachment button five times.After re-connecting the enpower dcb, the physician re-attempted the detachment, but no avail.Further re-attempts were made by slightly torquing and moving in and out the coil, and after pressing the detachment button four times, the coil was eventually detached.Pre-deployment was conducted prior to inserting and using.After the event, the procedure was completed without further issues by mainly using the competitive products due to the physician¿s apprehension with cashmere.There were no patient injury/complications.There was no report of if the procedure was delayed or not.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends, etc.) was noted on the product by visual inspection.Also no visible damages were reported on the devices after the events.There was no unintended detachment of the coil observed in the vessels or in the mc.Since the actual coil was successfully detached and the dpu and sheath have already been disposed, the complaint product is not available for analysis.No further information is available.The procedure was the coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm at the patient¿s ica.The patient¿s sex, dob and weight were unknown.The tortuosity and the calcification level of the patient¿s vessels were also unknown.There was no information of the concomitant devices used in the procedure.It was reported that an enpower dcb and a cable (lots unknown) were used for the above procedure.No further details of the concomitant devices are available.The device was not returned for analysis, and review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.The reported event could not be confirmed, since the product was not returned for analysis.Additionally, with the limited information is not possible to determine if user handling may have contributed to the event.Also, this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
821 fox lane
san jose, CA 95131
5088288310
MDR Report Key4327698
MDR Text Key5214885
Report Number2954740-2014-50058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K072173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCRC14123030
Device Lot NumberC20279
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/12/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/12/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-