• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PHILOS II DR; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PHILOS II DR; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 341826
Device Problem Failure to Interrogate (1332)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/12/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr - after an implantation time of about 56 months, it was reported that the pacemaker could no longer be interrogated.The device was exchanged and returned to biotronik for analysis.No deterioration of the patient's state of health was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The pacemaker was returned for analysis.The production process for this device was checked.The production documents did not show any irregularities that could be linked to the complaint.All production steps were correctly executed.After receipt, the implant was subjected to a visual inspection.The housing showed slight swelling, suggesting a discharged battery.The electrical test for the implant confirmed the clinical observation.The pacemaker could not be interrogated and the antibradycardia therapy function was not available.The device was then opened and the electronic module was visually analyzed.The interior construction showed no irregularities.The battery was found in a discharged state.During the next step, the battery was separated from the electronic module and the electronic module was subjected to electrical testing.With the connection of an external power supply, the pacemaker functionality was fully functional.The power consumption was normal and no irregularities were observed.There were no indications of the electronic module malfunctioning.The battery was returned to the manufacturer and was examined in detail.The extensive battery test showed that the battery was fully discharged.Nevertheless, the analysis showed a typical discharge.There was no indication of a battery defect.Summary: the clinical observation was confirmed.The analysis showed that the root cause was the discharged battery.In spite of the detailed analysis, the reason for the discharged battery could not be determined.Neither the battery nor the electronic module exhibited signs of a defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHILOS II DR
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-12 359
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key4337199
MDR Text Key21775061
Report Number1028232-2014-006105
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Invalid Data
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/05/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number341826
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/19/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/17/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-