• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 5MAX ACE REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 5MAX ACE REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5MAXACE132
Device Problems Break (1069); Suction Problem (2170)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/09/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left middle cerebral artery using a penumbra system max aspiration tubing, penumbra system 5max ace reperfusion catheters, and penumbra system non-sterile pump max supplies.During the procedure, the physician turned on the pump and there was no suction through the max aspiration tubing, the 5max ace reperfusion catheter, and the non-sterile pump max supplies.These products were exchanged and the procedure continued using other products.While attempting to advance another manufacturer's catheter through a new 5max ace reperfusion catheter, the physician found a break in the 5max ace.The 5max ace was removed and the procedure successfully continued using new devices.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This mdr is associated with mdr 3005168196-2014-00872, 00873, and 00874.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the 5max ace was fractured approximately 33.0 cm from the hub in the middle of the polymer material of the catheter shaft.The break showed evidence of material deformation and stretching.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The complaint indicated that while using a 5maxace, aspiration tubing, aspiration pump, and a canister, no suction was delivered to through the system.In addition, the complaint described that a second 5max ace ruptured in the proximal shaft when used with a non-penumbra microcatheter.Evaluation of the returned aspiration tubing (pst2) revealed no visible damage.The tubing was tested and was fully functional.No device issue could be confirmed.The other devices used with the tubing were not returned for evaluation therefore, the cause of the issue could not be determined.Evaluation of the returned 5max ace confirmed a fracture in the proximal shaft.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the 5max ace is manipulated at an angle while force is being applied, damage such as this may occur.According to dimensions listed on the non-penumbra product's website, the microcatheter described in the complaint should have been compatible with the 5max ace.Penumbra devices are 100% visually inspected for damage during process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM 5MAX ACE REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4338812
MDR Text Key5203360
Report Number3005168196-2014-00875
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K090752
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/19/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/31/2017
Device Catalogue Number5MAXACE132
Device Lot NumberF45354
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/12/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/15/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/17/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-