The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using pod5 and px slim delivery microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician experienced difficulty advancing a pod5 through a px slim and therefore, the pod5 unintentionally detached.The px slim and the detached pod5 were removed from the patient and the procedure continued using new devices.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
|
Conclusion: the product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined; however, the px slim used in the procedure was returned and evaluated.The complaint indicates that resistance was felt while attempting to advance the pod device through the pxslim delivery microcatheter.Evaluation of the returned pxslim delivery microcatheter revealed no issue with the catheter.The catheter was fully functional and within specification.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Hospital discarded the device.
|