• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS); INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS); INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number VTICMO12.6
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/01/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The reporter indicated the surgeon implanted a 12.6mm vticmo12.6 implantable collamer lens in the patient's left eye (os) on (b)(6) 2013.The lens has a low vault and a refractive surprise.The lens remains implanted.The surgeon is planning on explanting and exchanging the lens for a longer lens.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This product is manufactured in (b)(4) and is not marketed in the u.S.Pt weight: unk.Explant date: na.(b)(4).Device evaluated by manufacturer? no.Lens remains implanted.(b)(4).Lens implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A lens work order search was performed and no similar complaints were found within the work order.Medical review - clinical studies have shown that toric icl rotation occurs in (b)(4) of patients where a ticl has been implanted.Several factors may contribute to this phenomenon (i.E.Patients anatomical structure, a short lens, haptic position, etc.).Several factors may be involved in a post-operative refractive surprise, including inappropriate refractive surgical planning, a wrong lens calculation/selection, preoperative inaccurate determination of the eye's measurements to determine the power of the icl, induced refractive change by incisions, unstable cornea and/or refraction prior to implantation, cl-induced warpage, upside-down lens, etc.According to use fmea (failure modes and effect analysis) it has been determined that inadequate vaulting is a consequence of a wrong lens use failure mode (i.E.Improper white to white measurement, variability of the white to white measurements based upon different techniques utilized, improper sulcus to sulcus measurement (if ubm used), and patient condition; poor correlation of white to white measurement and length of ciliary sulcus in an individual case; irregular sulcus or ciliary sulcus cyst).A review of the device history record was performed and nothing was found in the manufacturing process of this lens that was the root cause of the complaint.Based on the complaint history, work order search, medical review and the device history record reviewt, a specific root cause of the event could not be determined.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VISIAN ICL (IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS)
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
haupstrasse 104
nidau, CH-25 60
SZ  CH-2560
Manufacturer (Section G)
STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY
haupstrasse 104
nidau, CH-2 560
SZ   CH-2560
Manufacturer Contact
althea watson
1911 walker avenue
monrovia, CA 91016
6263037902
MDR Report Key4362749
MDR Text Key5263541
Report Number2023826-2014-01157
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/03/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/31/2015
Device Model NumberVTICMO12.6
Other Device ID NumberDIOPTER -9.5/+1.5/090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/18/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/24/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/26/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/22/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/15/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age31 YR
-
-