• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ECURO DR-T PROMRI; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ECURO DR-T PROMRI; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 377367
Device Problem Premature Elective Replacement Indicator (1483)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/28/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr - after an implantation period of about 20 months, a battery depletion was reported.The pacemaker was replaced and the two leads were reconnected to the new device.The pacemaker was returned to biotronik.No adverse patient side effects have been reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt, the device was interrogated revealing the battery status eri.During the interrogation a warning message was triggered regarding the battery condition.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be flawless and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.There was no indication of a device malfunction.At a next step the memory content of the device was inspected.During the device interrogation it was observed that the battery status eri was triggered on (b)(6) 2014 as a result of a depleted battery.However, the memory content documented that the current consumption was normal.Therefore, the pacemaker was opened and subjected to further analysis.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies but the battery was found to be depleted.The battery was disconnected from the electronic module.Further thorough investigation of the electronic module did not show any anomalies.In particular the current consumption proved to be normal and expected.At a next step the battery was sent to the manufacturer for analysis.Analysis results of the battery: the manufacturing process for the battery was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process which might be related to the clinical observation.Subsequently the battery was subjected to a visual and an electrical inspection, including x-ray as well as microcalorimetry analysis and confirmed the battery depletion.However, the destructive analysis did not reveal any abnormality which might have led to the an early depletion of the battery.In summary, despite the dedicated analysis, the root cause of the early battery depletion could not be determined.The therapy functionality of the pacemaker was not compromised while implanted and in service.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ECURO DR-T PROMRI
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-12 359
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key4363971
MDR Text Key5290452
Report Number1028232-2014-006176
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Invalid Data
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number377367
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/07/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/29/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-