• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX SYSTEM; SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number A34-34/C80-O20V
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/17/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device remains implanted in the patient and is therefore, not available for analysis.Medical records and imaging were provided and reviewed by an internal clinical representative with the following impression: adequate medical documentation and suboptimal imaging studies were available for this review.Product use was incongruent with the ifu due to the 29% change in the aortic neck diameter and greater than 90 degree angulation of the left common iliac artery.Cautionary product use conditions that might have contributed to this event included: bilateral iliac artery tortuosity and the moderate-severe calcifications.Intraoperatively, there was evidence to support a type ia endoleak intra-operative for which an additional vela stent was placed.One month post implant, there was evidence to support an unknown endoleak; a differential diagnosis between a type ia or ii endoleak could not be established.There was no evidence of rendered treatment.The final patient disposition could not be established, but the aneurysm sac was noted to be decreasing in size on the last known ct scan.Reportedly, the patient is stable.A manufacturing record review was performed, the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.The lot usage history showed no other units from this lot were involved in any similar event.The product labeling was reviewed and confirmed that the reported event is adequately captured in the existing labeling.Based upon the investigation findings, the root cause could not be determined based upon available information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately 1 month post implant of a bifurcated device and a suprarenal aortic extension, the patient was seen for a routine follow-up.A computed tomography scan revealed an endoleak.The physician has elected to watch the patient for a month and then perform a secondary intervention.The patient is currently stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Endologix continues to investigate the reported event.Endologix will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Device remains implanted in patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX SYSTEM
Type of Device
SUPRARENAL PROXIMAL EXTENSION STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gail hapner
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984611
MDR Report Key4372402
MDR Text Key18462248
Report Number2031527-2014-00420
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/13/2015
Device Model NumberA34-34/C80-O20V
Device Lot Number1250755-020
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/30/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-