Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problem
Device Inoperable (1663)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/01/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device was no longer functioning.The patient was referred for surgery but no known surgical interventions have occurred to date.No further information relevant to the event has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
No surgical intervention has taken place to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from the physician that the report that the "device stopped working" does refer to a device malfunction.System diagnostic results from (b)(6) 2015 showed that the device at high impedance.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Brand name, corrected data: changed suspect device from generator to lead model 302 type of device, name, corrected data: changed suspect device to lead.Model #, serial #, lot#, expiration date, corrected data: changed to 302-20, 32099, 200340, 09/30/2009.Device manufacture date, corrected data: changed to lead date: (b)(6) 2006.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015 referral clinic notes were received.The notes dated (b)(6) 2015 state that the patient is doing ok but the vns is not working.The patient is working on insurance to approve the replacement procedure.Notes state that overall the patient is improving and is less depressed but without the benefit of the vns functioning properly she has been a little worse.The physician noted the device was checked and the parameters were left the same, both system and normal mode tests failed.Notes from (b)(6) 2015 state that she has had some fatigue and decreased motivation likely related to the vns malfunction.Although surgery is likely, it has not occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported on 02/18/2016 that the patient's generator was unable to be interrogated but they knew the patient had high lead impedance.The physician did not want to revise that day.The generator was replaced that day but the lead was not because of time.The explanted generator will not be returned due to the hospital protocol.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2016.The surgeon didn't think there was room to place the anchor tether on the vagus nerve due to scar tissue build up.Therefore, the lead was not removed.No known further interventions were taken to remove or replace the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
Programming history data revealed the another date in which high impedance was seen.It was later reported that the physician, dr.Nardone, stated that the there was too much scar tissue to replace the lead.This, fibrosis is already present in the file (comment 57).No surgery has occurred to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|