It was reported that a patient underwent a surgery using an interspinous process system at l4/l5.The patient received unspecified oral medications for the treatment.The patient was discharged 16 days post-op.According ot the report, during follow-up at another hospital, pain recurred 16 months post-op.There was no fracture of the spinous process noted.The patient underwent additional surgery for removal of the interspinous spacer device with laminectomy because recurrence of intermittent claudication was also observed.The event outcome was reported to be unresolved after the revision since the intermittent claudication somewhat remained even after the surgery.The physician considered that the event of recurrence of pain was due to the patient-specific factor and was not causally related to medtronic products.The physician judged the interspinous process spacer as ineffective in this patient.
|