W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number TGU282815 |
Device Problems
Premature Activation (1484); Material Separation (1562); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 01/01/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm with a conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis.It was reported during the procedure due to tight access vessels the device was advanced without a sheath.The device reportedly met resistance while being advanced.It was reportedly suspected by the physician the device was being caught on a previous placed dacron graft in the abdominal aorta.The device was reportedly withdrawn without being implanted due to the resistance that was met.During withdrawal of the delivery catheter, notable resistance was reportedly met, the leading olive became separated from the delivery catheter, and the device pre-deployed.It was reported the device was explanted.A second conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis was inserted into the patient.However, the device also met resistance at the level of the previously placed dacron graft.The device was withdrawn due to the resistance being met.It was reported the device was withdrawn with no issues.The device was set aside and discarded.A conduit was used to implant another conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis device and the procedure was completed.The aneurysm was repaired and the patient tolerated the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that these lots met all pre-release specifications.Additional devices involved: tgu313110/11397305.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm with a conformable gore tag thoracic endoprosthesis.It was reported during the procedure due to tight access vessels the device was advanced without a sheath.The device reportedly met resistance while being advanced.It was reportedly suspected by the physician the device was being caught on a previous placed dacron graft in the abdominal aorta.The device was reportedly withdrawn without being implanted due to the resistance that was met.During withdrawal of the delivery catheter, notable resistance was reportedly met, the leading olive became separated from the delivery catheter, and the device unintentionally pre-deployed in the distal aorta into right common iliac.It was reported a conversion from the abdominal aorta into right common iliac was performed to explant the leading olive and the device from the patient.The right hypogastric artery was reportedly covered due to the unintentional deployment and was repaired during the conversion.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected date of event.Corrected date gore aware.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|