• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Q-MED AB DEFLUX; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

Q-MED AB DEFLUX; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Abdominal Distention (2601); Test Result (2695)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A physician reported via a literature article pertaining to a retrospective chart review that a (b)(6) female received deflux (dextranomer microspheres/hyaluronic acid) injection into the submucosa of the urinary bladder as treatment for grade 3 vesicoureteral reflux to a transplanted kidney.Additional medical history included renal transplantation of a cadaveric donor kidney three years prior, febrile urinary tract infections, and a high and wide orifice in the right bladder wall on cystoscopy.Concurrent medications were not provided.On an unk date, the pt received deflux, 3 x 0.3 ml (0.9 ml total) to the transplanted kidney in a combined hydrodistention-implantation technique (hit) and subureteral transurethral injection technique (sting).Perioperative prophylaxis was given.Within 5 days serum creatinine rose from 120 to 250 mol/l.An ultrasound showed hydronephrosis and a ureteral stent was placed 10 days after the injection.After that, a slow regression of the serum creatinine was seen and the hydronephrosis resolved.The stent was removed 4 months later and ultrasound follow-up 5 weeks later showed no obstruction.The authors concluded that the incidence of ureteral obstruction complication was higher than previously reported in the literature.In addition, in relation to endoscopic treatment in transplanted kidneys, the authors were of the opinion that scarring at the site of ureteral anastamosis (decreased tissue compliance) and location for the transplant ureteral orifice were relevant for endoscopic treatment.Both scarring and position of the ureteral orifice could cause incorrect placement of deflux deposits and thus constitute risk factors for obstruction.Report received from q-med.The company assessed the events as possible related to deflux.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DEFLUX
Type of Device
AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
Q-MED AB
uppsala
SW 
Manufacturer (Section G)
Q-MED AB
seminariegatan 21
uppsala SE-7 52 2
SW   SE-752 28
Manufacturer Contact
8510 colonnade center drive
raleigh, NC 27615
9198621000
MDR Report Key4468399
MDR Text Key5182495
Report Number3009325614-2015-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
P000029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/28/2015,01/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/28/2015
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/08/2015
Date Report to Manufacturer01/20/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/28/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age10 YR
-
-