On (b)(6) 2015 it was reported that the patient underwent a generator replacement on (b)(6) 2013 due to the patient not feeling like the stimulation was working as he was becoming more depressed again.Good faith attempts for further information from the physician were unsuccessful.It was previously reported that the patient believed the generator was no longer working and the generator was interrogated and found to be near end of life.The explanted generator was returned for product analysis.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.No eri flags were identified during the analysis.
|