It was reported that a patient had undergone surgical lead revision on (b)(6) 2015 due to high impedance and that stimulation pulses were not perceived.The impedance following the lead replacement was reported to be correct.It was reported that high impedance had been observed on (b)(6) 2014.Review of programming history found that the pulse generator was enabled on (b)(6) 2014.No diagnostics were performed on that date.System diagnostics on (b)(6) 2014 resulted in high impedance, dcdc 7, neos no.It was reported that the suspected cause of high impedance was a wrong implant site of the lead electrodes.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.The explanted lead has not been returned to date.
|