• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY DIAMONDBACK ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY DIAMONDBACK ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBEC-125
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Perforation (2001); Stenosis (2263); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 02/09/2015
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
It was reported that during a coronary orbital atherectomy procedure, a perforation occurred while using a csi orbital atherectomy device (oad).The target lesion was 95% stenotic and was located in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.The physician used a run through crossing wire and quickcross catheter to access the lesion.The physician exchanged the crossing wire for a csi coronary viperwire guidewire and loaded the csi oad onto the guidewire.The physician completed two runs at low speed and two runs at high speed.Post-atherectomy angiography revealed a perforation at the site of treatment.The physician then placed two covered stents, but the patient status started to decline.A balloon pump and temporary pacemaker were placed in the patient, but the patient coded.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed to revive the patient.The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (icu) post-procedure.Three requests for additional information have been made, but none has yet been received.
 
Event Description
The patient expired four (4) days post-case and the physician stated it was related to the perforation that occurred during the case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device analysis: the oad was returned with the original guidewire.The initial visual and tactile examination of the handle assembly, saline sheath and driveshaft did not reveal any damage that would have contributed to the reported event.Further examination revealed that the crown and distal tip bushing remained intact and undamaged.Biological material was observed on the driveshaft and crown.The crown specifications and crown location on the driveshaft were measured and met the drawing specifications.The initial visual and tactile examination of the guidewire revealed numerous kinks along the shaft.It could not be determined if the kinks were present during the case or occurred as a result of handling or manipulation after the case.Further examination revealed that the spring tip and proximal adhesive bond remained intact and undamaged.An in-house 0.012" test wire was loaded through the device with no resistance.When tested, the device spun at low and at high speed with no abnormalities observed.The device was turned on and off numerous times with no issues observed.While performing functional testing the power cord, brake and control knob were manually manipulated to determine if there were any functional concerns with the components that would have contributed to the reported event.The device and components functioned as intended with no abnormalities observed.At the conclusion of the failure analysis investigation, the root cause of the perforation could not be determined.Biological material was observed on the driveshaft and crown, but the exact morphology of the material was not determined.The case details did not mention any device malfunction that would have caused the biological material accumulation.The device was within specification and performed as intended when tested.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
CORONARY DIAMONDBACK ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
651 campus drive
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
651 campus drive
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
megan brandt
651 campus drive
saint paul, MN 55112
6512592805
MDR Report Key4549403
MDR Text Key5524182
Report Number3004742232-2015-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2016
Device Model NumberDBEC-125
Device Catalogue NumberDBEC-125
Device Lot Number97650
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/11/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/09/2015
Initial Date FDA Received02/26/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
-
-