• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK PERIPHERAL ROTALINK® PLUS; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK PERIPHERAL ROTALINK® PLUS; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number M0011401500
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Same case as mdr id:2134265-2015-01023.It was reported that the burr was stuck on the rotawire.The chronic totally obstructed target lesion was located in a tortuous and severely calcified right anterior tibial artery.A 1.50mm peripheral rotalink® plus and an unspecified size peripheral rotawire¿ were used for treatment.During procedure, it was observed that the rotation speed of the device significantly dropped from 220,000rpm to 160,000rpm.It was then observed that the burr was locked onto the guidewire and was stuck.Both devices were removed from the patient's body.The procedure was not completed since the access across the target lesion was lost.There were no patient complications reported and the patient's condition was good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The complaint unit was returned connected to the catheter.A guidewire was returned inserted in the rotablator plus unit and was removed from the device without any issue.A visual examination of the complaint unit was carried out and no issues were noted.The advancer knob was locked upon return in a backward position; it was loosened and advanced in order to inspect the handshake connection and no damage was noted.A handshake connection test and a tug test was attempted to examine the integrity of the connection and no issues were noted.The drive shaft, coil and sheath were inspected and there was no damage noted.The complaint unit was wet tested.The complaint rotablator system did not reach any speed as the device stalled.The device was dismantled and was found out that a melted ultem and a corroded turbine was evident.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause has been determined to be use/user error as the dfu states: ¿never operate the rotablator advancer without saline infusion.Flowing saline is essential for cooling and lubricating the working parts of the advancer.Operation of the advancer without proper saline infusion may result in permanent damage to the advancer¿.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERIPHERAL ROTALINK® PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4570241
MDR Text Key19600440
Report Number2134265-2015-01024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121774
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2016
Device Model NumberM0011401500
Device Lot Number17182126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/11/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/09/2015
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
-
-