Patient was being monitored for anticoagulation status post pulmonary embolism by the (b)(6) we had patient referred to.Result came back as an inr of 3 but when we asked how the result was obtained we were told they used the alere inratio monitor.We asked that another method of testing be used and another inr monitor from a different mfr was used.At this point the result was an inr of 8.We sent the patient immediately to the emergency dept where she was treated for over anticoagulation with vitamin k.This caused increase expense and put the patient at risk or excessive bleeding should she have had an injury.In addition, we had to monitor her closely for a week after that until the effects of the vitamin k wore off the we once again had an accurate reading of her inr.We had been treating this patient for weeks based on erroneous results obtained from the alere monitor.This should not be tolerated.In addition, the company has not even offered to help us pay for a different machine so we could accommodate all of our patients' needs.
|