• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that the head restraints of the autopulse platform were damaged.No patient involvement was reported.No further information was provided.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the autopulse platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) message upon power up.Although the customer did not report this, ua 7 is considered a reportable malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform in complaint was returned to zoll on 01/28/2015 for investigation.Investigation results as follows: visual inspection of the returned platform was performed and the initial reported complaint of damaged head restraints was confirmed.It was found that the head restraints were damaged.In addition the front and bottom covers were observed to be cracked.When the platform was powered on during functional testing, it displayed a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large).Load cell characterization was performed and found load cell module 2 to be under reporting, causing the observed ua 7 advisory code.Following replacement of load cell module 2, the device passed functional test requirements.The platform's archive data was reviewed.There were no ua codes observed on the initial reported event date of (b)(6) 2015, whereby customer reported that the head restraints of the autopulse platform were damaged.The cause of the ua 7 code was previously identified as load cell 2 under reporting.The top cover was replaced to remedy the customer's reported complaint of the head restraints being damaged.All other damage noted during the visual inspection was remedied and load cell 2 was replaced to remedy the ua7 exhibited during initial functional testing.In summary, the initial reported complaint of the head restraint wires being damaged was confirmed through visual inspection.The root cause was determined to have been caused by user handling.Unrelated to the initial reported complaint, ua 7 was observed during power on of the platform.The ua 7 fault was attributed to load cell module 2 under-reporting.Following service, including replacement of the damaged parts, the device passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4571209
MDR Text Key5459823
Report Number3010617000-2015-00144
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/13/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Service and Testing Personnel
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/24/2015
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-