• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ECHOBRUSH ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND CYTOLOGY BRUSH; FDX ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ECHOBRUSH ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND CYTOLOGY BRUSH; FDX ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ECHO-19-CB
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Inflammation (1932)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
During a literature review of the paper 'sendino o, fernandez-esparrach g, sole m et al.Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided brushing increases cellular diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: a prospective study.Digestive and liver disease 2010; 42: 877-881' the following incident was noted; in an eus-guided cytology brushing procedure, one patient developed a haemosuccus pancreaticus which was managed conservatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Although no device malfunction has been reported, this incident meets the criteria of a serious injury report based on the intervention to treat the reported haemosuccus pancreaticus that developed following the use of an echobrush endoscopic ultrasound cytology brush.This complaint is related to an echo-19-cb device of an unknown lot number.The echo-19-cb device involved in this complaint has not been returned for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation was carried out.The complaint is considered based on the customer testimony.Clinical personnel were notified of this complaint and the following comments were provided: "hemosuccus pancreaticus is a rare entity and estimates of its rate are based on small case series.It is the least frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (1/1500) and is most often caused by chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocysts, or pancreatic tumors." it was the clinician's opinion that the reported adverse event was related to the clinical procedure and/or patient condition." as the echo device was not returned for evaluation and no specific device malfunction was noted during the procedure it is not possible to determine the root cause of this complaint however it is most likely procedure and/or patient condition related.As stated on the instructions for use that accompanies this device, potential complications with gastrointestinal endoscopy include, but are not limited to: perforation, hemorrhage, aspiration, fever, infection, allergic reaction to medication, hypotension, respiratory depression or arrest, cardiac arrhythmia or arrest.The manufacturing records of the device involved in this complaint could not be reviewed as the lot number of the complaint device was not provided.It was reported that the haemosuccus pancreaticus was managed conservatively.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ECHOBRUSH ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
FDX ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
sinead quaid,
EI  
61334440
MDR Report Key4585072
MDR Text Key5479496
Report Number3001845648-2015-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeES
PMA/PMN Number
K052279
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Unknown
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberECHO-19-CB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2015
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-