On (b)(6) 2014, a vital port was implanted on the patient.The port control scan showed some leakage at the catheter connection.Before the port was explanted, the patient felt cardiac arrhythmias and a new scan showed that the catheter lost connection to the chamber.The physician explanted the port and removed the disconnected catheter transfemoral out of the vessel.Afterwards, he trimmed the part of the catheter that had been connected to the chamber and sent this piece along with the chamber for investigation.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.A review of the dimension verification, complaint history, device history record, drawing and visual inspection was performed for the purpose of this investigation.One used mini titanium vital port was returned with this complaint.No catheter, catheter lock, or other accessories were returned.A visual inspection thus could not be performed on the catheter itself.A visual inspection of the vital port, confirmed that the suture holes were unused.No anomalies, burrs, or nicks were observed on the device or its outlet tube.A dimensional verification was performed on the outlet tub, which confirmed that the device was manufactured to specification.Manufacturing records for this device were reviewed, and no evidence of nonconformity that could lead to this complaint code was found.Because the catheter was not returned, it could not be inspected for signs of a proper connection.There is no evidence of manufacturing nonconformity based upon the vital port body that was returned.The suture holes were not used, which could contribute to longitudinal force applied to the catheter and lead to a disconnect.The customer is encouraged to read the ifu to ensure proper catheter advancement and suture hole attachment technique as used.
|