Report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) follows: it was reported that the surgeon was trying to place an implant when the blue part of the instrument detached.In order to complete the operation, he had to use a clamp to be able to finish the intervention.There was a prolongation of surgery, however the exact time is unknown.There was no patient harm.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information not reported.Event date: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The 510k#: device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The device was received, an investigation summary was performed.Visual inspection: welding between the handle and the inner shaft, hammer marks visible the investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: the returned impactor presents a broken welding between the handle and the inner shaft.Based on these findings we have to assume that heavy strokes on the impactor caused the breakage of the welding seam.Please note, the current surgical technique recommends inserting the pfna blade by applying only gentle blows with the hammer.Device history records was conducted.The report indicates that: the review of the production history revealed that this instrument was manufactured in october 2013 according to the specifications.No manufacturing related issues that would have contributed to this complaint were found.No manufacturing related failure could be detected, no indication for material or design related issue.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|