• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS) Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Headache (1880); Neuropathy (1983); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060)
Event Date 12/20/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Yin, s., jin, w., de salles, a.Occipital-device-related pain as a complication of deep brain stimulation.British journal of neurosurgery.2015 feb 7 2015:1-3.Summary: deep brain stimulation is an established treatment for movement disorders.We reported 4 patients (1.3%) of postoperative occipital headache related to the placement of the connection among 309 patients from 1998 to 2008.The patients were treated successfully by repositioning the connector into a groove created in the bone.Reported event one (b)(6) female patient with left side deep brain stimulation (dbs) for dystonia experienced post-operative occipital neuralgia considered to be caused by the placement of the connector wire.The patient reportedly had a unilateral retro-auricular headache in the location where the connector was implanted first occurring 6 months after implant.The patient did not experience infection or inflammation in the location of the connector wire and had no history of headache before the dbs operation.The reporter stated that the connector and wire were found to have drifted from the original operation site; the migration of the connector was noted to be ¿moderate.¿ the patient underwent surgical revision as a result.A high-speed drill was used to make a depression in the bone to completely cradle the connection system.Once this was completely molded and prepared, the connection system was placed inside the groove.The wires of the deep brain stimulator were completely connected during the surgery.The connector was then sutured to the fascia.The re-operation was performed 8 months after initial dbs system implantation, and within 1 month after the report of occipital pain.The reporter stated that it was likely that scar tissue forming around the connector interfered with the branches of the occipital nerves; when the connector migrated, the nerve branch was pulled, thus causing pain.The patient may have had irritation of the branches of the greater and/or lesser occipital nerve, resulting in pain near the connector.It was noted that there was no damage to the connector wire found.The patient¿s pain was reportedly relieved soon after the connector was replaced into the groove in the skull.The source literature did not include any specific device information.Further information has been requested; a supplemental report will be submitted if additional information is received.See attached literature article.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this date is based off of the date that the article was accepted for publication as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article or to match the events reported with previously reported events.Correspondence has been sent to the author of the article inquiring about patient information and additional information regarding the reported events.Concomitant product: product id neu_unknown_lead, lot # unknown, product type lead; product id neu_unknown_ext, lot # unknown, product type extension.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information reported that according to a physician involved with the case the event was ¿not related to any quality problem¿ with the products involved and instead the cause of the issue was ¿the position of the extension placed in the surgery.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 120
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4664774
MDR Text Key5733883
Report Number3007566237-2015-00904
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/28/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/07/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00027 YR
-
-